As governments combat the COVID-19 pandemic, Snopes is fighting an “infodemic” of rumors and misinformation, and you’ll assist. Read our coronavirus truth checks. Submit any questionable rumors and “recommendation” you encounter. Become a Founding Member to assist us rent extra fact-checkers. And, please, comply with the CDC or WHO for steerage on defending your group from the illness.
Even because the COVID-19 pandemic touched almost each nook of the planet, sporting a masks remained a highly politicized topic within the lead-up to the 2020 U.S. election. Throughout an Oct. 15, 2020, city corridor broadcast by NBC, U.S. President Donald Trump pushed inaccurate data that questioned the efficacy of sporting masks, regardless of main well being authorities’ suggestions.
When requested about his wavering responses to the concept of sporting a masks, Trump responded:
“However so far as the masks is anxious, I’m good with masks. I’m okay with masks. I inform individuals, put on a masks. However simply the opposite day, they got here out with a press release that 85% of the people who put on masks catch it.” The president’s response can also be recorded at across the 6-minute mark within the video under:
Trump didn’t title the supply of the “assertion” he referenced, however his feedback appeared to misrepresent a research carried out by the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention (CDC). There are two cases wherein “85%” was talked about within the CDC report, however neither reference solely prompt that 85% of individuals recognized with COVID-19 had worn a masks. Somewhat, the 2 85% figures associated to 2 completely different survey responses that contributed to the general findings of the research. It was not correct to make such a generalized assertion because the president did. Nevertheless, he was not the primary to amplify this misinformation.
Within the days main as much as the city corridor, publications just like the conservative on-line journal The Federalist and the conservative-leaning California Globe ran articles that misinterpreted the research, claiming that an “overwhelming majority” of people who contracted COVID-19 had worn a masks, suggesting that maybe sporting a masks made an individual extra prone to contract the virus.
This declare is fake.
The analysis in query was carried out by the CDC and printed within the U.S. COVID-19 mortality report on Sept. 11, 2020. Whereas this isn’t a peer-reviewed research printed in a scientific journal, the company shared the data to supply perception into how SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, could also be transmitted each inside communities and between shut contacts.
It’s true that just about three-quarters of research individuals reported that they’d worn a masks or fabric face masking whereas in public within the two weeks previous their COVID-19 prognosis. Nevertheless, the findings don’t recommend that masks and face coverings are ineffective at stopping the unfold of COVID-19. Somewhat, the report argued that though individuals mentioned that they’d worn a masks, that doesn’t essentially imply they wore it correctly. And even when they wore their masks appropriately and adopted suggestions, such measures could also be inadequate in sure settings.
“Exposures and actions the place masks use and social distancing are tough to keep up, together with going to locations that provide on-site consuming or consuming, may be vital danger components for buying COVID-19,” wrote the company. “As communities reopen, efforts to scale back doable exposures at areas that provide on-site consuming and consuming choices ought to be thought-about to guard clients, staff, and communities.”
To characterize how group and close-contact exposures contribute to the unfold of COVID-19, each of which have been decided to be driving components of the pandemic in October 2020, researchers interviewed greater than 300 adults from 11 U.S. well being care services. Greater than 150 “case-patients” — adults that had been uncovered to the coronavirus, examined constructive, and have been experiencing signs — have been in contrast towards 160 outpatients from the identical services who examined detrimental for the virus however skilled signs.
Research individuals have been contacted inside about three weeks of their preliminary testing. They have been requested about their mask-wearing habits and doable group actions that may have uncovered them, akin to in-home gatherings, going to the salon or health club, utilizing public transportation, and going to a restaurant. For every exercise, individuals have been requested to quantify how effectively they adhered to coronavirus mitigation suggestions, like sporting a masks and training social distancing, utilizing “none” to “nearly all.”
About three-quarters of research individuals from each teams (71% of case-patients and 74% of management individuals) reported having at all times worn a masks or fabric face masking when in public, however individuals who examined constructive have been extra prone to have been in shut contact with an individual who additionally examined constructive — and almost twice as prone to have dined at a restaurant.
In brief: the CDC research was testing what actions made an individual extra prone to contract SARS-CoV-2 and the way mask-wearing and social distancing measures would possibly affect an infection charges. Having shut contact with an individual recognized with COVID-19 or going to areas that provide onsite eating was related to a better probability of being recognized with the illness.
“On this investigation, individuals with and with out COVID-19 reported typically related group exposures, except going to areas with on-site consuming and consuming choices,” wrote the well being company. “Adults with confirmed COVID-19 (case-patients) have been roughly twice as doubtless as have been management individuals to have reported eating at a restaurant within the 14 days earlier than turning into unwell.”
The research just isn’t with out limitations. To start with, the pattern measurement is comparatively small. Secondly, research individuals self-reported their masks use, which might current a possibility for false reminiscences or poor recall. Contributors have been additionally conscious of their an infection and agreed to participate within the research, which might have influenced their responses.
Even so, the research means that elevated an infection charges amongst those that had dined at eating places could also be linked to air circulation. The course, air flow, and depth of airflow might affect virus transmission even when social distancing measures are adopted. Individuals taking their masks off to eat and drink in closed-circulation areas may additionally make them extra prone to an infection.
The findings held implications for public well being, notably as many U.S. states have been partially open or allowed dine-in consuming in October 2020.
“Consuming and consuming on-site at areas that provide such choices may be vital danger components related to SARS-CoV-2 an infection. Efforts to scale back doable exposures the place masks use and social distancing are tough to keep up, akin to when consuming and consuming, ought to be thought-about to guard clients, staff, and communities,” wrote the CDC.
As of mid-October, the CDC continued to recommend that an individual put on a masks each time in public or round individuals who don’t reside in the identical family. A full checklist of suggestions might be discovered here.